Who wants to do what?

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Who wants to do what?

35% 35% 
[ 17 ]
2% 2% 
[ 1 ]
12% 12% 
[ 6 ]
16% 16% 
[ 8 ]
16% 16% 
[ 8 ]
18% 18% 
[ 9 ]
 
Total Votes : 49

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by sethrosen on Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:00 pm

I don't have much time to reply, I think anything short of a total redesign of our government will fail. Using history only as a guide we need to really look at what makes people tick and what type of government is the best now in these modern times.

For the most part we all have been lied to and sold a bunch of crap when it comes to the history of this country. For all I know we are a corporate entity, a wholly owned subsidiary of England, but who knows what the real story is? If you look at how this government behaves I would say we are an Authoritarian Fascist Democratic Republic The Powers That Be just fail to mention the first two.

So I say scrap it all and build something from scratch that honors humanity and protects the environment without depriving anyone. Doing away with outdated dogmatic notions of founding fathers and original intent of the constitution because it's all opinionated bullshit anyway. Anything less then complete interdependence and peaceful coexistence without false dichotomies and irrelevant labels would be a continued failure of our species.

Seth

sethrosen

Posts: 2
Join date: 2011-10-20
Age: 45
Location: NJ-1

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by PDT on Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:13 pm

I once knew someone, long ago, who had written A Declaration of Interdependence.

PDT

Posts: 169
Join date: 2011-10-19
Age: 52
Location: PA-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by aliendancer on Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:30 pm

sethrosen, I agree that scraping what we have and starting fresh would be the best idea. That would take a lot of support. Not sure if we can muster enough support but it certainly should be put on the table as a discussion item.

aliendancer

Posts: 5
Join date: 2011-10-19
Age: 62
Location: VA-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by stvcrd on Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:50 pm

I think it would be very hard to present a third party alternative - it would very likely lose. I propose that there should be an active focus on all the congressional and senate seats that will be up for voting in 2012. The Tea Party did this and were successful. It is important that before that there is a manifesto to which the OWS backed representatives would adhere and agree to, otherwise it will be difficult to function as a bloc if they are wildly successful and are elected.

I am not very optimistic honestly - it will take a lot of selflessness and sacrifice to overcome the odds of beating the system.

stvcrd

Posts: 1
Join date: 2011-10-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by arroyoruy on Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:59 pm

I joined this because I would like for this government to return to the ideals set up during its foundation. I suspect many of us are looking for similar things. "In order to form a more perfect union." But, I am very uncomfortable with placing labels on myself. I am human and an American with an uncompromising loyalty to the truth and the right everyone has for "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." I believe many roads can lead to the preservation of those rights. My loyalty is towards any road that is effective in practice. Theories are for philosophers and good conversations with friends.

arroyoruy

Posts: 10
Join date: 2011-10-22
Age: 46
Location: MD-03 Baltimore

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by RAB on Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:14 pm

I'm interested in a national general assembly. A list of grievances has been done, by both the general assembly of OWS and the 99% Declaration group. I would suggest the assembly create key demands and explain why these are necessary to change the system. IMHO, the whole point of the Occupy movement is to create a worldwide teach-in, where we can discuss, educate, and refine our approach.

RAB

Posts: 29
Join date: 2011-10-21
Location: CO-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by RayArrowood on Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:50 pm

Thank you all for voting in the poll and expressing your concerns.

I'll give the poll a few more days and then try to include the new suggestions and rewrite some options to accommodate everyone.

Thus far I have only sent personal invitations to 150 of our members. I have to do this one at a time so it will take some time to get more votes.

On the next round I will eliminate the "other" write in option so we can get a better view of the remaining options.

RayArrowood

Posts: 233
Join date: 2011-10-18
Age: 63
Location: US Nomadic

http://the-utopian.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by rborskie@mindspring.com on Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:08 pm

The constitution promises freedom, but it doesn't mention anything about the economy, except that we will pay our bills. A democracy is a political system, the Free Market is an economic system. They are not the same, and there was never a promise from our founding fathers promising a Free Market System. I think they did that because they've seen in the past that those with the most money take control and manipulate, so they offer a vote to every citizen, and not just the land owners. It seems our economic and political systems have gotten mixed up. 94% of the politicians who spend the most money end up winning.

As for individuals, yes, do what you want, just don't hurt anyone else. Don't kill other people, don't hit them or rape them. Don't steal from them or belittle their reputations. All these things hurt other people. As long as you're not doing those, then you should be good.

You shouldn't have to worry about the law, or about your neighbors pushing bills banning your actions because they don't coincide with your own actions. If you're against gay marriage, then don't marry someone who's the same sex as you. If you're against abortion, don't get one. If you're against drugs, don't do drugs. If you don't believe Islam is the proper religion for you, then don't worship Allah. It's very simple, just let adults live their lives the way they want to, as long as they don't push it on you.

rborskie@mindspring.com

Posts: 5
Join date: 2011-10-28

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by SaintNuke on Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:55 pm

I voted for support group, but in all honesty, everything but "third party" I could agree with.

Personally I don't care if you're anarcho-capitalist (free market libertarian), anarcho-syndicalist (libertarian socialist), socialist, Marxist, Nazi, any point in between, or a guy that thinks all of our national decisions should be made with a magic 8-ball.

The underlying problem right now is that all of us, regardless of political stripe HAVE NO VOICE unless someone on this board is a bank CEO. Any wedge you can find serves no one except those at the top.

A third party won't solve anything, because win or lose, you're back to 2 big tent parties instead of an accurate reflection of what the people actually want.

If you want the country to go for X principals, fine, create an open party proportional representation list and find out who else agrees with you. Smash all barriers to voting for anyone that has a right to franchise.

aliendancer:
There's a long history of (generally) economic left libertarianism, it became especially prevalent after WW2 with the fall of fascism. Right-libs aren't fascists of course, but seeing how corporatism could destroy a state and gain enormous power made people flinch. (like we're seeing here now) The only thing libertarians of any stripe have in common is the idea that the burden of proof is always on the authority to explain why it should have power. The same reasons a left-libertarian would be for a national healthcare system is the same reason another libertarian (left or right) could be against abortion. The end result is to maximize liberty and debt slavery or removing a child's chance to live is seen as an attack on the victims by someone else's power.

I always thought an interesting way to describe corporations was Chomsky's: "An unaccountable private tyranny."

If you're interested in different stripes of libertarianism I suggest looking outside the US, where the Cold War created a unique stripe that conflated economic issues with social issues. The highly socialized Nordic models are a good place to start as they enjoy great economic and social liberties.

The bulk of the groundwork for either stripe comes from John Stuart Mills "On Liberty". It's definitely worth a read, but keep in mind he wrote it in the 1800s, a lot has changed since then. Even his own thoughts changed in his time regarding some things. He was also one of the first feminists Razz He had no concept of a corporation in its current sense, he was for inheritance tax, he had no concept of health care, let alone a national healthcare system. So when you read him keep in mind that while some of his ideas are timeless, like any philosopher, other elements of his writings are firmly entrenched in their time and have no place in a modern society.

Others have picked up his torch to deal with current questions, but the main yardstick by which anything is measured is what he called the "harm principal"

If your Google Fu is decent you should end up with more searching than you probably want on the subject Very Happy

SaintNuke

Posts: 43
Join date: 2011-10-19
Location: KS-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by PDT on Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:08 pm

I voted for support group as well, because I believe that we need this type of foundation before anything else can occur. This will become an assembly just through its mere existence. If we choose to further that goal into some other organization, such as an election of delegates, meeting at an actual location, thats fine. I think the fact that Occupy is a physical meeting of people and minds is what gives it such merit. You will probably need both. Finally, the outcome of all of this must be demands that the people lay at the door of our government. What they choose to do with it determines our next move. Some sort of political party may be the last option.

But first things first.

-Paul

PDT

Posts: 169
Join date: 2011-10-19
Age: 52
Location: PA-02

Back to top Go down

My Intent

Post by uncommonfilth on Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:28 pm

SHORT TERM(present-early summer 2012):

I want to formulate a Petiton of a few specific Grievances, and Corresponding Solutions, that I can sell to my "Occupy NOLA 504" GA and, the 70% of the Electorate(active voters){and maybe a few "Libertarians"jk, AL}, that I feel could support a few reasonable, fairly applied Reforms that would at the very least, level the economic playing field, and DIRECTLY ADDRESS the Issue of Growing Disparity.Then I'd like for Me and as many American Citizens as possible to Hand Deliver, said Petition to OUR Gov't for Immediate Redress!!!

And, Or if a NGA is feasible or necessary, I'm down for that, but I am absolutely convinced it would have to integrate with the live "Occupations" to really get the support necessary to pull-off..

I'm already registered for a minority Party, and I like their platform, so if a third Party were the goal, I'd rather work to get the existing Minority Parties together..at least wherever it's possible.

As far as the support group option goes, I'm fine with that as an additional purpose, I'm kinda busy trying to figure out/visualize the best way to integrate they 3-4 communities involved with this(live-in occupiers, supporters/non-tent occupiers but actively involved in local GAs, the Homeless/non-movement occupiers, and the online communtities, so as to achieve, as much positive change, for the most Americans possible...Some fascinating dynamics for the social science hobbiests like myself..

Long Term: we'll have to see how this short term thing works out to know what to do next, but I'm confident that we'll have plenty to do...If we can get some momentum, skies the limit!!

uncommonfilth

Posts: 128
Join date: 2011-10-20
Location: LA-01

Back to top Go down

Petition for Nat. Referendum on Const. Amend and Start New Party

Post by simplee on Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:01 am

I voted "other". I think that we have an excellent Declaration and grievances already, which just needs a few clarifications, & typos fixed, and a little tweaking here and there. So, I suggest we:

A) Put the finishing touches on the existing Declaration and Grievances

B) Put together a formal petition demanding that Congress hold a national referendum on the two most popular (and most fundamental) of our demands:

(1) Constitutional amendment to rescind corporate personhood,

(2) Constitutional amendment to rescind equating of money and free      speech,

C) Begin printing out copies of the petition to circulate for signatures.

D) Begin process of setting up basics needed for launching of a new independent party and identifying possible candidates for each seat we need to win.

The two-pronged strategy in this is to gather as many signatures as possible in order to impress on Congress the enormous popularity of our demands, in order to force Congress to hold a referendum, or risk losing the votes of a huge block of voters (all those who sign the petition).

Additional motivation for Congress to hold the referendum would be for us to declare that if they do not hold the referendum, we will formally launch our new party and run candidates against every legislator who does not support and vote to enact our demands.

simplee

Posts: 92
Join date: 2011-10-22
Location: AZ-08 Tucson

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by PDT on Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:29 am

Nice work simplee, I like that.

PDT

Posts: 169
Join date: 2011-10-19
Age: 52
Location: PA-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Who wants to do what?

Post by RAB on Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:02 am

Simplee writes:

B) Put together a formal petition demanding that Congress hold a national referendum on the two most popular (and most fundamental) of our demands:

(1) Constitutional amendment to rescind corporate personhood,

(2) Constitutional amendment to rescind equating of money and free speech,

These are valid issues, but even if they were implemented, they would ultimately change nothing, because the way that the financiers have taken over the world is by controlling the once sovereign currencies and credit of nations.

As Mayer Amschel Rothschild said, "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws."

The federal government and the states must own their own banks, i.e., we need a network of publicly owned banks.

Eliminating corporate personhood would be a good second choice.

RAB

Posts: 29
Join date: 2011-10-21
Location: CO-02

Back to top Go down

Creating a truly representational democracy

Post by johnmulkins on Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:56 am

I had to go with other because I feel a NA is not the right model for organizing. A People's Congress is a better organizing model because it 1.) Implies that the current congress is irrelevant, and 2.) it implies that the Congress should only represent People, and 3.) that We the People can do a better job than Congress at legislating solutions. Doing a Peoples Congress is something the nation can "relate" to. An "Assembly" will be a more complicated sell.

I would put the emphasis on solutions, not so much the grievances. We do not need to complain, we all know the problems. It would be much more inspirational to focus of the solutions we agree upon, and more constructive.

I also strongly encourage everyone to simply focus on solutions which make our democracy more representational. That is an organizing principal which everyone can agree on. Issues can be dealt with, and we can also write policy statements about many things, but until we dismantle the dysfunctional relationship between media, elections, corporate governance and policy-making, our democracy is in peril, people will be left out of the process. Making our government "Of, For, and By the People" should be our central goal. If we succeed at that, we can then let OUR government do it's job, which is to represent US!

in solidarity,
John



RayArrowood wrote:This poll is to determine how many of us want to do what. Our mission or missions so to speak. It is also a polling experiment. If you don't like the options presented, please check "other" and write in your suggestion in the discussion area. Then I will rewrite the poll and we will vote again.

johnmulkins

Posts: 23
Join date: 2011-10-23
Location: CA-13

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum